How were these tools compared?

Each entry lists pricing, the free tier, what the tool does well and where it falls short, taken from the tool's own site, pricing page and public reviews. Every page carries the month its facts were last checked.

Are these comparisons biased towards DraftScreens?

They are written by DraftScreens, so read them with that in mind. Every page has a section that says when the other tool is the better choice, and several of them are: for web apps, for working code, or for teams that live in Figma or Miro.

Which AI tool is best for mobile app design?

It depends on what you need out of it. For a working app, a builder like Rork is the right kind of tool. For screens that look designed, stay consistent across a flow and export to Figma and code, DraftScreens only does mobile and is built for exactly that.

Can I use DraftScreens together with these tools?

Yes. A common path is to design the screens in DraftScreens, then hand them to a coding tool such as Cursor, Claude Code, Lovable, v0 or Rork with the prompt pack export, or paste the layers into Figma.

AI app design tools, compared honestly

Every tool below is good at something. These pages say what, where each one falls short, and when DraftScreens, an AI designer that only does mobile screens in a real design language, is the better pick.

Uizard

AI wireframing and mockup tool, now part of Miro.

Best for: Teams already in Miro who want quick wireframes and heatmaps. Free tier: 3 generations a month.

Uizard alternative · DraftScreens vs Uizard

Google Stitch

Google Labs' free prompt-to-UI tool, formerly Galileo AI.

Best for: Quick, free first drafts when generic is fine and the tool going away would not hurt. Free tier: Everything, with a daily credit cap.

Google Stitch alternative · DraftScreens vs Google Stitch

Figma Make

Figma's prompt-to-web-app feature, with First Draft for single screens.

Best for: Figma-native teams prototyping web apps inside the files they already use. Free tier: Starter seats get a small credit allowance.

Figma Make alternative · DraftScreens vs Figma Make

Claude Design

Anthropic's conversational design canvas inside Claude, a research preview since April 2026.

Best for: People already paying for Claude who want a fast first draft of a prototype, a deck or a landing page. Free tier: None: not on the free Claude plan.

Claude Design alternative · DraftScreens vs Claude Design

Magic Patterns

AI design tool that generates on-brand web screens from your component library.

Best for: Product teams with a React component library who want on-brand web screens. Free tier: About 50 credits.

Magic Patterns alternative · DraftScreens vs Magic Patterns

Visily

AI wireframing tool with strong free collaboration.

Best for: Teams that want to sketch flows together for free and toggle wireframe to hi-fi. Free tier: 300 credits and up to 50 collaborators.

Visily alternative · DraftScreens vs Visily

Banani

Text to clickable prototype, fast, with unlimited-credit plans.

Best for: Founders who want a clickable prototype in minutes and do not want to count credits. Free tier: Generate and preview, no exports.

Banani alternative · DraftScreens vs Banani

Appthetics

AI mobile UI designer positioned as the design layer before vibe coding.

Best for: Indie makers who want a cheap lifetime deal and bring their own model key. Free tier: Screenshot maker trial; generation needs a plan.

Appthetics alternative · DraftScreens vs Appthetics

Sleek

AI mobile app designer that turns a prompt or a reference image into iOS and Android screens.

Best for: Teams that want an AI coding agent to drive the design tool through an API, and the budget for it. Free tier: 60 one-time credits, about 2 or 3 screens, 1 project.

Sleek alternative · DraftScreens vs Sleek

ScreensDesign

A library of more than 2,700 real iOS apps with videos, paywalls and onboarding flows, plus Create, an AI design canvas.

Best for: Makers who want to study how top-grossing iOS apps onboard and sell before they design their own. Free tier: No free plan listed.

ScreensDesign alternative · DraftScreens vs ScreensDesign

Polymet

Code-first AI design generator with Figma import and export.

Best for: Web product teams who want React, Tailwind and shadcn output with design-system support. Free tier: Limited trial.

Polymet alternative · DraftScreens vs Polymet

Galileo AI

The original prompt-to-UI tool, acquired by Google and relaunched as Stitch.

Best for: People searching for Galileo AI today are looking for Stitch or a maintained alternative. Free tier: Stitch is free with a daily cap.

Galileo AI alternative · DraftScreens vs Galileo AI

Motiff

A Figma-parity editor with AI at $4 a seat, shut down in June 2026.

Best for: Former Motiff users need somewhere to go. Free tier: None, the product is gone.

Motiff alternative · DraftScreens vs Motiff

UX Pilot

AI UI generator with a Figma plugin, for web and mobile screens.

Best for: Designers who want AI drafts directly inside a Figma plugin. Free tier: Trial credits.

UX Pilot alternative · DraftScreens vs UX Pilot

Rork

Chat-to-React-Native app builder with App Store publishing.

Best for: Shipping a working Expo app from chat, when you are fine with whatever UI the model emits. Free tier: 5 credits a day.

Rork alternative · DraftScreens vs Rork

AppAlchemy

Chat-based mobile app builder that creates, exports and launches iOS and Android apps.

Best for: Shipping a working iOS and Android app from chat when the code matters more than the design. Free tier: No free plan listed.

AppAlchemy alternative · DraftScreens vs AppAlchemy

v0 by Vercel

Vercel's prompt-to-Next.js generator.

Best for: Web UI and Next.js apps on Vercel. Free tier: $5 of credits.

v0 by Vercel alternative · DraftScreens vs v0 by Vercel

Every tool, side by side

Tool	Mobile-native screens	Figma	Free tier
DraftScreens	Yes: every screen is a 390x844 phone screen in a real design language	Yes: editable named layers, paste onto any canvas	3 designs a day, failed generations not counted
Uizard	Partly: mobile templates, web-first generation	Import only, no export	3 generations a month
Google Stitch	App or web toggle; output is generic	Paste to Figma with auto layout	Everything, with a daily credit cap
Figma Make	No, web-first	Native (it is Figma); Make copies one way	Starter seats get a small credit allowance
Claude Design	Phone-sized screens from a general canvas	No export	None: not on the free Claude plan
Magic Patterns	No, web screens	Yes, bidirectional plugin	About 50 credits
Visily	Mobile templates on a web canvas	Import and export	300 credits and up to 50 collaborators
Banani	Mobile-sized, web style	Export on paid plans	Generate and preview, no exports
Appthetics	Yes	Yes	Screenshot maker trial; generation needs a plan
Sleek	Yes, mobile only	Yes: editable layers, limited on Free	60 one-time credits, about 2 or 3 screens, 1 project
ScreensDesign	Yes, iOS	Not listed	No free plan listed
Polymet	Weak, by their own admission	Import and export	Limited trial
Galileo AI	See Google Stitch	Paste to Figma	Stitch is free with a daily cap
Motiff	Gone	Gone	None, the product is gone
UX Pilot	Mobile presets	Plugin	Trial credits
Rork	Yes, as code	No	5 credits a day
AppAlchemy	Yes, as code	Not listed	No free plan listed
v0 by Vercel	No	No	$5 of credits

Start from your situation

Your situation	Best pick	Why
Founder or indie maker designing a mobile app	DraftScreens	Connected screens in one design language, a prototype on your phone, Figma layers and a code hand-off.
You want a running app this week, design later	Rork	Chat to a working React Native app with store publishing.
A coding agent should drive the design tool	Sleek	REST API and agent skills for Claude Code, Cursor and Codex.
A deck, a landing page or a quick web prototype	Claude Design	A general canvas, included with a paid Claude plan.
No budget, exploring an idea	Google Stitch	Free prompt-to-UI with a daily cap. So is the DraftScreens free plan.
Low-fidelity wireframes with a team	Visily	Generous free collaboration and a wireframe to hi-fi toggle.
Web product on your own React components	Magic Patterns	Generates on-brand web screens from your component library.
Researching how top apps onboard and sell	ScreensDesign	A library of real iOS apps, paywalls and flows.

Questions people ask

How were these tools compared?: Each entry lists pricing, the free tier, what the tool does well and where it falls short, taken from the tool's own site, pricing page and public reviews. Every page carries the month its facts were last checked.
Are these comparisons biased towards DraftScreens?: They are written by DraftScreens, so read them with that in mind. Every page has a section that says when the other tool is the better choice, and several of them are: for web apps, for working code, or for teams that live in Figma or Miro.
Which AI tool is best for mobile app design?: It depends on what you need out of it. For a working app, a builder like Rork is the right kind of tool. For screens that look designed, stay consistent across a flow and export to Figma and code, DraftScreens only does mobile and is built for exactly that.
Can I use DraftScreens together with these tools?: Yes. A common path is to design the screens in DraftScreens, then hand them to a coding tool such as Cursor, Claude Code, Lovable, v0 or Rork with the prompt pack export, or paste the layers into Figma.