Appthetics alternative: DraftScreens, the mobile-only AI app designer
AI mobile UI designer positioned as the design layer before vibe coding.
Facts checked August 2026. www.appthetics.com
Verdict
Appthetics proved the idea and shipped it thin. DraftScreens takes the same wedge further: a real visual editor, design systems, connected flows that stay consistent, a clickable prototype, Figma layers, and no failed generation ever charged.
DraftScreens and Appthetics, side by side
| Feature | DraftScreens | Appthetics |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free 3 designs a day. Pro $15/mo or $144/yr. Studio $49/mo with design systems and seats. | Lite $60/yr (240 credits), Pro $140/yr (600 credits), Lifetime $79 bring-your-own-key. |
| Free tier | 3 designs a day, failed generations not counted | Screenshot maker trial; generation needs a plan |
| Mobile-native screens | Yes: every screen is a 390x844 phone screen in a real design language | Yes |
| Your design system | Yes, on Studio: palette, fonts, voice, rules and logo drive every generation | Limited |
| Figma | Yes: editable named layers, paste onto any canvas | Yes |
| Code and hand-off | HTML per screen, prompt pack for Cursor, Claude Code, Lovable and v0; Expo and SwiftUI hand-offs in progress | Code export and prompts for coding tools |
| Clickable prototype | Yes: tap-through links on every screen, QR to your phone, public share page | Share links |
| Visual editor | Yes: select any element, edit text, colour, spacing, layout, links, or ask the AI about it | AI visual editor with limited control |
| Failed generations | Never charged, refunded automatically | Credits consumed |
Appthetics: strengths and gaps
What Appthetics does well
- The same wedge as DraftScreens: mobile design before code
- Figma export, prompt hand-offs, screenshot and icon tools
- Cheap annual plans and a lifetime deal
Where it falls short
- Limited fine-grained control, by its own admission
- Limited design-system support, no team features
- Bring-your-own-key pushes model costs and setup onto you
- Three active subscriptions and site reliability issues at last check
What DraftScreens does differently
Mobile only, on purpose
Every screen is a 390x844 phone screen. The generator is prompted like a senior mobile designer, never like a web page builder.
One design language per project
A flow is planned first: palette, type, radius, spacing. Every screen and every edit is held to it, so screens do not drift.
Edit anything, or ask
Select any element and change text, colour, spacing, layout or its tap link; or select it and tell the AI what to change.
Your brand, every screen
Studio plans ingest a design system: palette roles, fonts, voice, rules and logo drive the planner and every screen.
A prototype, not a picture
Buttons, tabs and rows carry links. Preview in the studio or scan a QR and tap through on your phone.
Exports that survive the move
Editable Figma layers, HTML per screen, a prompt pack for Cursor, Claude Code, Lovable and v0. Failed generations are never charged.
When Appthetics is the better choice
Best for: Indie makers who want a cheap lifetime deal and bring their own model key.
Pick Appthetics if a $79 lifetime deal with your own API key matters more than editing depth and support.
Questions people ask
- Is Appthetics free?
- The screenshot maker has a free trial; generating screens needs Lite ($60 a year) or Pro ($140 a year), or the $79 lifetime deal with your own API key.
- What does bring-your-own-key mean?
- You pay the model provider directly for every generation on top of the lifetime fee, and you set up the key yourself.
- How is DraftScreens different from Appthetics?
- Deeper editing (select any element), design-system ingestion, consistent multi-screen flows, a tap-through prototype, and failed generations never count.
More comparisons
- DraftScreens vs Appthetics, head to head
- Uizard alternative
- Google Stitch alternative
- Figma Make alternative
- Claude Design alternative
- Magic Patterns alternative
- Visily alternative
- Banani alternative
- Sleek alternative
- ScreensDesign alternative
- Polymet alternative
- Galileo AI alternative
- UX Pilot alternative
- Rork alternative
- AppAlchemy alternative
- v0 by Vercel alternative
- All comparisons