Does UX Pilot work inside Figma?

Yes, its main workflow is a Figma plugin.

Does DraftScreens have a Figma plugin?

Not yet; paste export with editable layers works today and a plugin with auto layout is next.

DraftScreens vs UX Pilot: which AI app designer fits you?

AI UI generator with a Figma plugin, for web and mobile screens. DraftScreens is an AI designer that only does mobile screens, in one design language per project, with a visual editor, a clickable prototype and exports to Figma and code. Here is how they compare, including when UX Pilot wins.

Facts checked August 2026. uxpilot.ai

The short version

UX Pilot drafts inside Figma. DraftScreens drafts outside it, keeps every screen in one design language, lets you edit any element, wires a prototype, and then lands in Figma as editable layers.

Side by side

Feature	DraftScreens	UX Pilot
Pricing	Free: 1 design a day, up to 5 a month. Pro $15/mo or $144/yr (200 designs a month, all exports). Studio $49/mo (1,000 designs, design systems, 3 seats).	Free trial credits, then paid plans from around $12 a month.
Free tier	1 design a day, up to 5 a month, with PNG export, the editor and a prototype	Trial credits
Mobile-native screens	Yes: every screen is a 390x844 phone screen in a real design language	Mobile presets
Your design system	Yes, on Studio: palette, fonts, voice, rules and logo drive every generation	No
Figma	Yes, on Pro and Studio: editable named layers, paste onto any canvas	Plugin
Code and hand-off	On Pro and Studio: HTML per screen and a prompt pack for Cursor, Claude Code, Lovable and v0; Expo and SwiftUI hand-offs in progress	Limited
Clickable prototype	Yes: tap-through links on every screen, QR to your phone, public share page	No
Visual editor	Yes: select any element, edit text, colour, spacing, layout, links, or ask the AI about it	In Figma
Failed generations	Never charged, refunded automatically	Credits consumed

Which one to choose

Choose UX Pilot if

Pick UX Pilot if you want generation to happen inside the Figma plugin panel and will do all editing in Figma.

Best for: Designers who want AI drafts directly inside a Figma plugin.

Choose DraftScreens if

The product is a mobile app, the screens have to look designed rather than generated, you want to tap through it on a phone before writing code, and you want Figma layers and a hand-off that a coding tool can build from.

UX Pilot: strengths and gaps

What UX Pilot does well

Figma plugin workflow
Web and mobile presets
Predictive attention heatmaps

Where it falls short

Generic, template-like output
Screens drift across a flow
Thin editing outside Figma

What DraftScreens does differently

Mobile only, on purpose

Every screen is a 390x844 phone screen. The generator is prompted like a senior mobile designer, never like a web page builder.

One design language per project

A flow is planned first: palette, type, radius, spacing. Every screen and every edit is held to it, so screens do not drift.

Edit anything, or ask

Select any element and change text, colour, spacing, layout or its tap link; or select it and tell the AI what to change.

Your brand, every screen

Studio plans ingest a design system: palette roles, fonts, voice, rules and logo drive the planner and every screen.

A prototype, not a picture

Buttons, tabs and rows carry links. Preview in the studio or scan a QR and tap through on your phone.

Exports that survive the move

Editable Figma layers, HTML per screen, a prompt pack for Cursor, Claude Code, Lovable and v0. Failed generations are never charged.

Questions people ask

Does UX Pilot work inside Figma?: Yes, its main workflow is a Figma plugin.
Does DraftScreens have a Figma plugin?: Not yet; paste export with editable layers works today and a plugin with auto layout is next.