How much does Polymet cost?

Pricing is not public; reported plans run around $50 to $100 a month.

Is Polymet good for mobile apps?

Polymet says mobile output lags its web output. DraftScreens is mobile only.

DraftScreens vs Polymet: which AI app designer fits you?

Code-first AI design generator with Figma import and export. DraftScreens is an AI designer that only does mobile screens, in one design language per project, with a visual editor, a clickable prototype and exports to Figma and code. Here is how they compare, including when Polymet wins.

Facts checked August 2026. polymet.ai

The short version

Polymet is a solid web design-to-code tool. For mobile it concedes the point; DraftScreens is built only for phone screens, in a committed design language, with a prototype and exports to Figma and coding tools at an indie price.

Side by side

Feature	DraftScreens	Polymet
Pricing	Free: 1 design a day, up to 5 a month. Pro $15/mo or $144/yr (200 designs a month, all exports). Studio $49/mo (1,000 designs, design systems, 3 seats).	About $50 to $100 a month; pricing is not public.
Free tier	1 design a day, up to 5 a month, with PNG export, the editor and a prototype	Limited trial
Mobile-native screens	Yes: every screen is a 390x844 phone screen in a real design language	Weak, by their own admission
Your design system	Yes, on Studio: palette, fonts, voice, rules and logo drive every generation	Yes
Figma	Yes, on Pro and Studio: editable named layers, paste onto any canvas	Import and export
Code and hand-off	On Pro and Studio: HTML per screen and a prompt pack for Cursor, Claude Code, Lovable and v0; Expo and SwiftUI hand-offs in progress	React, Tailwind, shadcn
Clickable prototype	Yes: tap-through links on every screen, QR to your phone, public share page	Web previews
Visual editor	Yes: select any element, edit text, colour, spacing, layout, links, or ask the AI about it	Code-first
Failed generations	Never charged, refunded automatically	Credits consumed

Which one to choose

Choose Polymet if

Pick Polymet for web products where React plus shadcn is the target and a design system already exists.

Best for: Web product teams who want React, Tailwind and shadcn output with design-system support.

Choose DraftScreens if

The product is a mobile app, the screens have to look designed rather than generated, you want to tap through it on a phone before writing code, and you want Figma layers and a hand-off that a coding tool can build from.

Polymet: strengths and gaps

What Polymet does well

Figma import and export
Design-system support
Clean React, Tailwind and shadcn code

Where it falls short

Mobile output is weak, by their own admission
Hidden pricing at a high price point
shadcn-flavoured output looks like every other AI app

What DraftScreens does differently

Mobile only, on purpose

Every screen is a 390x844 phone screen. The generator is prompted like a senior mobile designer, never like a web page builder.

One design language per project

A flow is planned first: palette, type, radius, spacing. Every screen and every edit is held to it, so screens do not drift.

Edit anything, or ask

Select any element and change text, colour, spacing, layout or its tap link; or select it and tell the AI what to change.

Your brand, every screen

Studio plans ingest a design system: palette roles, fonts, voice, rules and logo drive the planner and every screen.

A prototype, not a picture

Buttons, tabs and rows carry links. Preview in the studio or scan a QR and tap through on your phone.

Exports that survive the move

Editable Figma layers, HTML per screen, a prompt pack for Cursor, Claude Code, Lovable and v0. Failed generations are never charged.

Questions people ask

How much does Polymet cost?: Pricing is not public; reported plans run around $50 to $100 a month.
Is Polymet good for mobile apps?: Polymet says mobile output lags its web output. DraftScreens is mobile only.